However, I strongly agree with the above statement I don't know whether it seems to be right for everyone.
I think that the disinterested help for everyone in need is really worth fallowing and praising. Some influential and open-handed people often make the great effort to help the poor. Most of these poor people are unable to better their conditions because of their disability and misfortunes. They benefit from the aid provided by wealthy people.
Nonetheless, it is very often observed when such charity actions are undertaken to achieve some personal goals of these wealthy people. Some of them decide to support the poorest part of our society just for the main reason to show off or avoid paying taxes. This is called hypocrisies and it shouldn't be followed. A lot of charity foundations, apart from doubtful help for the poor, are used to promote politicians or businessmen interests. It is for me immoral to take advantage of charity to increase someone's popularity and make the incomes bigger. What is more, I am the great enthusiast of creating the new working places for unemployed people to make them the opportunities to gain some money for their most important needs. I think that there are a lot of people who possess even basic skills that enable them to take up the easiest jobs.
Taking all the arguments into account I strongly opt for giving the possibility for the poorest people to lead normal, but simple lives. It is much profitable than pity for them.
